Arizona Court of Appeals Division two holds that A.R.S. § 33-727(B) does not entitle lienholders with higher priority than the foreclosing lienholder to the excess proceeds generated by the junior lienholder’s foreclosure sale.
The Arizona Supreme Court holds that a lienholder satisfies the requirement to notify a property owner prior to bringing a foreclosure action by delivering the notice to all three of the addresses specified in the statute, even if the lienholder has reason to believe the owner did not receive the notice.
Arizona Supreme Court holds declaratory action not barred by failure to exhaust administrative remedies when there is not a pending administrative proceeding.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that a grantor’s statements made after executing a beneficiary deed may provide relevant, admissible evidence of undue influence.